From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 12 15:10:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7372127 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C46A1E for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1CFA1r4002566 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1CFA1VY002564; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201302121510.r1CFA1VY002564@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mark Felder Subject: Re: ports/176012: irc/inspircd fails to detect OpenSSL in base running recent stable/9 r246610 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Felder List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:10:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176012; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Felder To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, Trond.Endrestol@ximalas.info Cc: Subject: Re: ports/176012: irc/inspircd fails to detect OpenSSL in base running recent stable/9 r246610 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:04:44 -0600 ------------R3eRDlQt1WWoKw9rzslT0e Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes Patch included in PR was somehow broken (by GNATS?); attached is a fixed patch. I've tested this in poudriere jails for FreeBSD versions 7.4 and 8.3. It builds with base OpenSSL showing no obvious issues. I don't have an infrastructure available to test the OpenSSL module, but I don't suspect there to be any problems. I accept this patch to the port. ------------R3eRDlQt1WWoKw9rzslT0e Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch-configure Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=patch-configure Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tIGNvbmZpZ3VyZS5vcmlnCTIwMTMtMDItMTIgMDg6NDE6NDguOTYwMzIwMjM3IC0wNjAw CisrKyBjb25maWd1cmUJMjAxMy0wMi0xMiAwODo0MjowMi43NDMzMDgwODggLTA2MDAKQEAg LTI3MiwxMSArMjcyLDExIEBACiBjaG9tcCgkY29uZmlne0dDQ01JTk9SfQkJPSBgJGV4ZWNg KTsKICRjb25maWd7TUFYQlVGfQkJCT0gIjUxMiI7CQkJCSMgTWF4IGJ1ZmZlciBzaXplCiAK LWlmICgkY29uZmlne0hBU19PUEVOU1NMfSA9fiAvXihbLVs6ZGlnaXQ6XS5dKykoW2Etel0p PyhcLVthLXpdWzAtOV0pPyQvKSB7Ci0JJGNvbmZpZ3tIQVNfT1BFTlNTTH0gPSAkMTsKLX0g ZWxzZSB7Ci0JJGNvbmZpZ3tIQVNfT1BFTlNTTH0gPSAiIjsKLX0KKyNpZiAoJGNvbmZpZ3tI QVNfT1BFTlNTTH0gPX4gL14oWy1bOmRpZ2l0Ol0uXSspKFthLXpdKT8oXC1bYS16XVswLTld KT8kLykgeworIwkkY29uZmlne0hBU19PUEVOU1NMfSA9ICQxOworI30gZWxzZSB7CisjCSRj b25maWd7SEFTX09QRU5TU0x9ID0gIiI7CisjfQogCiBpZiAoKCRjb25maWd7R0NDVkVSfSBl cSAiIikgfHwgKCRjb25maWd7R0NDTUlOT1J9IGVxICIiKSkgewogCWlmICgkY29uZmlne0lT X0RBUldJTn0gZXEgIllFUyIpIHsK ------------R3eRDlQt1WWoKw9rzslT0e--