Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:38:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: USE_X_PREFIX Message-ID: <20040417003837.GB93908@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404161932460.7224-100000@pancho> References: <20040416231307.GA92313@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404161932460.7224-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 07:35:12PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > To be correct it should probably be
> >=20
> > PREFIX?=3D ${X11BASE} # This port itself does not require X=
lib
> > .if ${XFREE86_VERSION} =3D=3D 3
> > MTREE_FILE=3D /etc/mtree/BSD.x11.dist
> > .else
> > MTREE_FILE=3D /etc/mtree/BSD.x11-4.dist
> > .endif
>=20
> With a new release of XFree86 on the way, as well as the new refactored
> codebase from freedesktop.org, does it still make sense to try to support
> this older version? Is the only advantage that some older video cards
> are not supported in the later versions?
Some people still use it for that reason, so I don't think we should
actively break support when it doesn't cost much.
Kris
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAgHyNWry0BWjoQKURAhw3AJ43wzd9+q/eiydfuzQS25J1sMF8nwCfVKsj
wvVqUAjMPQWPa/g+ppe9JrQ=
=L1Ro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040417003837.GB93908>