Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:16:43 +0200 From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> To: Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EV1 Servers makes me sick Message-ID: <20061002201643.GA57069@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <d3ea75b30610021121w42a4a2f3sbcc7c3dd6271fd06@mail.gmail.com> References: <d3ea75b30610021121w42a4a2f3sbcc7c3dd6271fd06@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:21:33PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently > installed we will not be able to support this. We have found that the > versions after 5.4 are inherantly unstable. Please let us know what > course of action you would like to take." >=20 > I could not believe it. Well, these are the same guys that bought a license from SCO for SCO's alleged "IP" in Linux (and alledgedly in *BSD, before the settlement in USL vs BSDi was made public). Apparently after a large bribe^H^H^H^H^Hdiscount from Microsoft. Definitely not the sharpest knife in the drawer, IMHO. But maybe I'm being too harsh. What they're effectively saying is "we don't value your business". The only correct answer is, "fine, I'll take it elsewhere". Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFIXOrEnfvsMMhpyURApCMAJwNl5AraR5dFew5LZg8/xe0pERBbgCcDgKJ cQItNF4zCnjb5jOTmePW+UE= =CFDG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061002201643.GA57069>