Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:46:11 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/quake2lnx Makefile distinfo pkg-message pkg-plist ports/games/quake2lnx/files extra-patch-src_rogue_g__local.h extra-patch-src_rogue_q__shared.c extra-patch-src_xatrix_q__shared.c patch-Makefile patch-src::game::g_phys.c patch-src::linux::gl_glx.c patch-src::linux::rw_in_svgalib.c ... Message-ID: <20051117204611.GK1239@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20051117133108.GA29488@FreeBSD.org> References: <200511171051.jAHApSWX074582@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051117133108.GA29488@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:31:08PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > * Change patch names (using "_" instead of "::"), and also some patches. > > I was under impression that we do not do this for patches already there, > this convention typically should be only applied to new patch files. I was aware of this rule, but I was slightly distracted while I commited the first bunch of PRs and went "oh shit" when I saw the files getting in. The good news is that I checked the rest of the PRs for this before they went in. I'm even going to ask for a repocopy I thnk to call it linux-quake2 to get in line with other quake ports, is that okay? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051117204611.GK1239>