Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:49:13 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Cc:        Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com>
Subject:   Re: Multiple choices for RAID-0, best performance?
Message-ID:  <20040625064913.GB33437@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <p0600207bbd0080d2d8df@[10.0.1.3]>
References:  <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAArboJgGwHU0apkIeCcojdKwEAAAAA@telia.com> <p0600207bbd0080d2d8df@[10.0.1.3]>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:02:33PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> 	That takes us back down to geom-vinum, geom-stripe, perhaps some 
> SCSI RAID controllers which aren't affected by any of the ATA stuff, 
> and maybe ccd.

Why "maybe ccd"??
It works fine.  I've been using ccd(4) for the past 4 years for all my
FreeBSD development drive space.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040625064913.GB33437>