From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 12 00:47:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1922106564A; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B16F8FC0A; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epsilon.delphij.net (drawbridge.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E68E1E395; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:47:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1347410820; bh=CaDsdajA+cby+AUMx8O36wJKaCglp+zPddJqWQXNPOE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=bDaTnglZM5+AegzZqRH5SQ2VpjibrO/9rkSNBHVB7PKClrw7Ul1ftX2O4S2z9Y97G Za+sE+U4pERELlIc22IKf28jnF460nHy1E/ve+S4qq9a59PfZosYQyzXCOyPEDB0XS WmQEo0ziCfsWhkdQzvBCn+5cD2r2+op7mi3+Av5s= Message-ID: <504FDB83.6090701@delphij.net> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:46:59 -0700 From: Xin Li Organization: The freeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120830 Thunderbird/10.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <86sjao7q8c.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20120911205302.27484fd6@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120911200925.GA88456@dragon.NUXI.org> <504FA76A.5000209@delphij.net> <20120911211730.GB89188@dragon.NUXI.org> <504FAB87.3020701@delphij.net> <20120911215212.GA89515@dragon.NUXI.org> <504FBD15.8040907@delphij.net> <20120911230121.GA90289@dragon.NUXI.org> <504FC7B0.2060706@delphij.net> <20120912000738.GA90897@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20120912000738.GA90897@dragon.NUXI.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Arthur Mesh , Doug Barton , freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, RW , =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyDvv70=?= , d@delphij.net Subject: Re: svn commit: r239569 - head/etc/rc.d X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:47:00 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 09/11/12 17:07, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:22:24PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: >> Please consider using sha512... > > What is the performance (boot time) impact on low-end MIPS and ARM > systems? > > I'm all for sha512, but don't want to be shot with a machine gun > (vs. simple pistol). I think we will have to run it on real hardware to find out... SHA512 is faster on 64-bit systems though. Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQT9uDAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzwwoIAIAzPWHkUcDydno3ecmltDUa Ta5POY2RwU/SHC8j4vOsZbcUgxoZoq8c168Wc/VdcpYPSK7q+y+6YY0my7UqbOCT n6taOGLvZEHYDSCv/eSrByzNW22Huo1kcxBcl9YdfPr24xOU9jI81JXtEjiGrX5A Kvc8kG965OH7T5zISAEKKUTVvowql5OvywoLrvRgr5Fmv2+o4XmkDkSAcZknBzaC dDluzj7D9gPUd6DKZanJu8vpuz8L+IEMkOWLsmv+Be3CTP+eYeY+lIokXCZMYCRv BjYxZ+1bhNKkruu+VYyCFtOY2ZqGBYKLlHCoKa8K/rg3ON2HhVqXnbsPHRWEEoE= =YQY1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----