From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 28 21:06:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B4316A62A; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from samus.cyberbotx.com (cyberbotx.com [70.88.125.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5DB44562; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:14:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by samus.cyberbotx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54F9C164; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:14:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cyberbotx.com Received: from samus.cyberbotx.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (samus.cyberbotx.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H5nQwov2RzGe; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:13:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from metroid (c-68-61-58-20.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.61.58.20]) by samus.cyberbotx.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 60F18C0F9; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:13:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <025001c69aef$61cfafe0$fe02a8c0@metroid> From: "Naram Qashat" To: References: <200606271718.k5RHIH1W002164@freefall.freebsd.org> <020201c69a38$bbe6d0b0$fe02a8c0@metroid> <1151480656.93043.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <023401c69ab8$495ba2c0$fe02a8c0@metroid> <1151507143.93043.23.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:13:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/99556: editors/scite fails complaining about lua X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:06:16 -0000 What really doesn't make sense about this is that I know that gcc usually looks for functions in reverse order, so if all the object files after LuaExtensions.o have the functions that LuaExtensions.o is looking for, why would gcc complain and say it can't find those functions? I checked and those functions are defined in those other Lua object files given. Plus I know SciTE has been able to compile under FreeBSD 6.1 before, because I did recompile it some time after upgrading to 6.1. Naram Qashat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pav Lucistnik" To: "Naram Qashat" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:05 AM Subject: Re: ports/99556: editors/scite fails complaining about lua