From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 14:24:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D4F16A4CF; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:24:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sizone.org (mortar.sizone.org [65.126.154.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F6343D64; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:24:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by sizone.org (Postfix, from userid 66) id B09D13079D; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:24:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 456481D2095; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:24:41 -0500 (EST) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16391.4904.780733.759206@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:24:40 -0500 To: Andre Oppermann In-Reply-To: <40070DC0.42229CBE@freebsd.org> References: <40055744.5030607@freebsd.org> <16390.61995.829098.247043@canoe.dclg.ca> <4006F47D.592D4CF1@freebsd.org> <16390.63251.901089.277458@canoe.dclg.ca> <4006FBA0.F2057876@freebsd.org> <16391.3166.777608.201388@canoe.dclg.ca> <40070DC0.42229CBE@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 14) "Reasonable Discussion" XEmacs Lucid cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: David Gilbert Subject: Re: kern/61215: off-by-one error likely in ip_fragment() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:24:46 -0000 >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Oppermann writes: Andre> Ok, I am asking you to check out if it works for you the same Andre> way it works for me. Then we can proceed to the next step and Andre> try to find out why it is different than it used to be for you. Well... I did ask what link1 was about, but my gre tunnel says: gre0: flags=9011 mtu 1476 tunnel inet 24.100.27.151 --> 66.246.133.17 inet6 fe80::2d0:9ff:fee4:bbc2%gre0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 66.246.133.114 --> 66.246.133.113 netmask 0xfffffffc if I add link1, 'RUNNING' also appears. If I -link1, running disappears. link1 seems to be about routing stupidity ... which isn't an issue here. I can ping 66.246.133.17 as I have an explicit route for it. Either way, tcpdump -i dc0 doesn't show gre packets leaving the machine. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================