Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:17:04 +0400
From:      Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
To:        Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/lua Makefile
Message-ID:  <864odkh7vz.fsf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100920124925.GG68468@bluepex.com> (Renato Botelho's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:49:26 -0300")
References:  <201009201201.o8KC1r9H076269@repoman.freebsd.org> <86sk14ipcr.fsf@gmail.com> <20100920122320.GE68468@bluepex.com> <86tylkh9vt.fsf@gmail.com> <20100920124925.GG68468@bluepex.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:33:58PM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
>> Using CFLAGS= in make.conf is broken. This port is not the only thing
>> that may break. And it builds fine with CFLAGS+=.
>
> I didn't know about it, is it broken or deprecated? i'll try to find
> more information.

No, I was mostly thinking about misuse. But whether resetting *default*
CFLAGS to empty string works or not I'm not sure without seeing results
from an exp-run.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864odkh7vz.fsf>