From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 30 16:50:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D210D16A402; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (salama58.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.207.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CDF43D45; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:50:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from ping.int.athame.co.uk ([192.168.10.8]) by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FaF7p-00071d-Il; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:50:25 +0300 From: Andy Fawcett To: "Jeremy Messenger" Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:50:25 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1146349274.16564.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200604301614.30077.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Face: ?fLK282oT!Ss!(krp%ft%TWfrkz*Mxz<2hwkRBzd); #D/=!=XjYKFBh1wVeov4K&<=?utf-8?q?Z6bi=5F=0A=09=7BBvAjk1diod2?=,DQo`Xz<\$~fX7B>U`u0HC\Gc+B9Hxu"bjBc16tg~i4.,2A1>=?utf-8?q?=7BrcRK=5Fi!i=0A=097e79f=7CT=3B9=23gfr=3DG1u=27xS=3D?=(}_NSP,Gs>HDq Cc: ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, Joe Marcus Clarke Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:50:26 -0000 On Sunday 30 April 2006 19:41, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 08:14:28 -0500, Andy Fawcett wrote: > > On Sunday 30 April 2006 01:21, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >> At this late stage of the 5.5/6.1 release cycle, it was deemed > >> that none of the packages were going to be rebuilt, so we have > >> been given permission to merge GNOME 2.14 into the ports tree at > >> this time. > >> > >> The first step will be a merge of GStreamer 0.10. When that is > >> complete, the tree will be locked for the GNOME 2.14 merge. The > >> good news is that this latest update no longer comes with the > >> shared library change for GLib, GTK+, or any other low-level GNOME > >> component, so upgrading will be much easier. > > > > Hi, > > > > Some problems: > > > > 1. "portupgrade -a" updates gstreamer to 0.10, but not all the > > plugins seem to have 0.10 versions (gstreamer-plugins-artsd for > > one). Did this deserve a note in UPDATING? > > Did you run 'pkgdb -Ff'? I did, yes. > It should move from gst-plugins-artsd to gst-plugins-artsd80 for you, > and the pkgdb should be show you a message of "Not part of gstreamer > 0.10 yet" (from ports/MOVED). > Therefore, I don't think it needs to be add in the UPDATING. I have another box to upgrade later, I'll double-check the effects of the UPDATING notes there. > > 2. gstreamer-plugins-artsd80 has faulty patches, and fails. > > Fixed, thanks for report! Missed to remove a patch when the merge > went in. cool :) > > 3. howl has been deprecated to avahi, which conflicts with both > > howl and mDNSresponder. This means portupgrade -a now fails for me > > because I have mDNSresponder installed (for KDE I think) and also > > howl from an earlier gnome. Seems that howl and mDNSresponder never > > had CONFLICTS set, if I'm reading the Makefiles correctly. This > > CONFLICTS on mDNSresponder now causes upgrade to fail. Is avahi > > compatible with mDNSresponder, and if so does this mean we need yet > > another switch same as we had for gamin/fam earlier? > > I don't know much about avahi, so I will let someone to answer it. ahze@ seems to have fixed the note in UPDATING for it, although I'm not sure it's enough. At least x11/kdelibs wants mDNSResponder, and if avahi is already installed the dependencies will be recorded incorrectly. I've already informed kde@ A. -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org