From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb 27 12:43:07 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id MAA05242 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 12:43:07 -0800
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA05235 for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 12:43:03 -0800
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA07039; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 13:46:10 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 13:46:10 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199502272046.NAA07039@trout.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
       "Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD" (Feb 27, 12:51pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[ Replacing FreeBSD libraries with NetBSD versions ]

> Well, part of being an OEM means:
> 
> o	You don't follow every commit message.  You make code-cuts.
> 
> o	You don't "merge".  You replace.
> 
> o	You don't track errors.  They track errors.
> 
> The question is whether is is an acceptable way to handle the problem
> or not.

IMO, this is unacceptable.  See previous message.


Nate