Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:58:23 +0200
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r296320 - in head/sys: kern sys
Message-ID:  <20160303115823.GQ67250@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <56D821A7.2020105@selasky.org>
References:  <201603021846.u22IkHWM010861@repo.freebsd.org> <56D81918.6020403@selasky.org> <20160303112716.GO67250@kib.kiev.ua> <56D821A7.2020105@selasky.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:36:07PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 03/03/16 12:27, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >> >BTW: The FreeBSD kernel version should have been bumped because
> >> >_callout_stop_safe() is a public callout API, used by all external
> >> >kernel modules, which now will have undefined behaviour until recompiled.
> > The change was done in a way which is compatible with the pre-commit
> > callout_stop_safe(9)  users.  I even consider it mergeable into the
> > stable/10 without requiring any shims.
> >
> >
> 
> Yes, your change is compatible if you compile the code, but not binary 
> compatible. See the following macros, and how they use _callout_stop_safe():
My change is binary compatible.

> 
> #define callout_stop(c)         _callout_stop_safe(c, 0, NULL)
> #define callout_async_drain(c, d)                                       \
>      _callout_stop_safe(c, 0, d)
> 
> Because callout_stop(c) is a macro, you've now change the API for 
> callout_stop() aswell. This is what I think will break binary 
> compatibility in 10.x.
How my commit changes anything for either callout_stop(), or for
callout_async_drain(), or for callout_drain() ?

> 
> That's why the need to bump __FreeBSD_version__
> 
> --HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160303115823.GQ67250>