From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 31 17:39:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B89F37B401; Sat, 31 May 2003 17:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F5943F93; Sat, 31 May 2003 17:39:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h510dwQg094444; Sat, 31 May 2003 17:39:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.3/Submit) id h510dwoT094443; Sat, 31 May 2003 17:39:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 17:39:58 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20030531173958.C91048@xorpc.icir.org> References: <3ED94166.7070300@btc.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from rwatson@FreeBSD.org on Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:18:10PM -0400 cc: Scott Long cc: re@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 00:40:00 -0000 On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:18:10PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > On Sat, 31 May 2003, Scott Long wrote: > > > It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will* > > address this one way or another before the release. I apologize for > > taking so long. > > Ditto, here, unfortunately. I managed to hose my sparc64 box a couple of > weeks ago trying to upgrade it to run precisely these tests, but haven't > had time to figure out how to recover it. no need to apologize, as i said i am perfectly fine with people not having time, and surely the RE team is taken by more urgent issues these days. My mail was meant just as a reminder, nothing more. As for the patch i posted: i don't claim it to be perfect, it might contain some trivial bug such as passing the wrong variable to a function, but hopefully those are things that a programmer who has access to the box can find out and fix very quickly. cheers luigi