Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:17:17 -0500 (CDT)
From:      "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Subject:   Re: flash10 vs f10
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906261316080.3059@thor.farley.org>
In-Reply-To: <43784537@ipt.ru>
References:  <20090606162235.GA49444@triton.kn-bremen.de> <43784537@ipt.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote:

> Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> writes:
>
>>  Anyway, on to www/linux-f8-flashplugin10 with OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT
>> and OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS both f10:  I got that going after
>> removing libidn from the port's USE_LINUX_APPS (its part of linux_base-f10)
>> and installing two new dependencies of f10's libcurl:
>> 	libldap-2.4.so.2 in openldap-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386.rpm
>> and
>> 	libsasl2.so.2 in cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-19.fc10.i386.rpm
>> (so we'll need two new ports for these),
>
> Are you sure that those two ports are necessary? I had no reports
> that something doesn't work without those libraries.
>
>> and then finally to get
>> libflashsupport working too (i.e., audio) I had to
>> 	ln -s libssl.so.7 /compat/linux/lib/libssl.so.6
>> - so we probably need a new linux-f10-flashsupport too if we want to
>> avoid that symlink.
>
> Can you provide one? Then we can create a repocopy and commit
> a new port. Thanks!

Here you go (at least for the binary):
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2009-June/006401.html

Sean
-- 
scf@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0906261316080.3059>