Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:22:46 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/share/sgml release.ent Message-ID: <20060921202245.GC1152@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <45129F21.4070808@freebsd.org> References: <200609201648.k8KGmb7D062822@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060921094047.GD35454@submonkey.net> <45129F21.4070808@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006.09.21 07:18:09 -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:48:37PM +0000, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > >> bmah 2006-09-20 16:48:37 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD doc repository > >> > >> Modified files: > >> share/sgml release.ent > >> Log: > >> Make 6.2-BETA and its release process visible on the Web site. > > > > This isn't enough to make the BETA appear on where.html. There used to > > be an include.releases.xml and an include.releases.sgml, but I no longer > > understand how the entities work. > > It worked in my local tests, honest! :-p > > Hmmm. I wonder if it's a dependency problem, where the Makefiles are > not aware that where.html (other files too?) needs to be rebuilt if > release.ent changes. I confess to not knowing a darn thing about how > this part works. It seems that's the case. I cheated and touched where.sgml on www.freebsd.org and forced a new build and BETA1 showed up now. hrs, do you know how to correctly get the dependency detected? -- Simon L. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060921202245.GC1152>