From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 22 18:41:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6C716A420; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:41:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (heechee.tobez.org [217.157.39.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6610543D45; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:40:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1F496125493; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:40:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:40:57 +0200 From: Anton Berezin To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050922184057.GA97327@heechee.tobez.org> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200509220748.j8M7mYMT043867@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050922164036.GA97847@utopia.leeym.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050922164036.GA97847@utopia.leeym.com> X-Powered-By: FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:41:05 -0000 On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:40:36AM +0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:48:34AM +0000, Anton Berezin wrote: > > tobez 2005-09-22 07:48:34 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo > > Log: > > Update to 1.15. Require perl from ports. Assign maintainer to perl@. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.7 +7 -11 ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/Makefile > > 1.3 +2 -2 ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/distinfo > > Just curious... > > Is it a policy to assign maintainer to perl@ for the ports@ owned p5-* > ports? Not really, it's a matter of personal preference. I did not feel like having a maintainer lock on some of those ports, but I did not want them to stay unmaintained, either. There is, I think, a better chance that someone (myself included) will take care of such when they belong to perl@ as opposed to ports@. \Anton. -- An undefined problem has an infinite number of solutions. -- Robert A. Humphrey