Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:14:49 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will XFS be adopted Message-ID: <gf7crk$f4b$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <49172D82.1010103@fuckner.net> References: <20081109174303.GA5146@ourbrains.org> <49172D82.1010103@fuckner.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig70098100B729841373551942 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael Fuckner wrote: > Dan wrote: >=20 > Hi! >> With XFS being adopted by Linux now for a number of years, I wonder wh= y >> it hasn't been by FreeBSD.=20 > this is not correct. >=20 > Please read man 5 xfs. > The xfs file system support first appeared in FreeBSD 7.0. Well yes, but you can't really call read-only support for a file system its proper adoption. AFAIK there have even been talks of removing reiserfs and xfs as the read-only support is almost useless and there have been problems maintaining them actively (nobody's interested enough)= =2E FWIW, I'd like read-write XFS, too, regardless of ZFS. --------------enig70098100B729841373551942 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkXNqkACgkQldnAQVacBchblQCfeYcsb73e3rOuShvZFkcUHBj2 Di4AoK6SZKMEJcUhS34Z2rkqhvqLHI3K =S6Hv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig70098100B729841373551942--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gf7crk$f4b$1>