From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 14 17:11:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lcremeans.erols.com (lcremeans.erols.com [216.164.87.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05253151BE for ; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 17:11:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lee@lcremeans.erols.com) Received: (from lee@localhost) by lcremeans.erols.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id UAA01454; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 20:09:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lee) Message-ID: <19990414200907.A1423@erols.com> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 20:09:07 -0400 From: Lee Cremeans To: Ollivier Robert , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux References: <3714EFA7.239DEBF5@chen.ml.org> <19990414155546.A753@erols.com> <19990415000208.A23723@keltia.freenix.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <19990415000208.A23723@keltia.freenix.fr>; from Ollivier Robert on Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 12:02:08AM +0200 X-OS: FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE Organization: My room? Are you crazy? :) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 12:02:08AM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Lee Cremeans: > > Or *did* they think of it? If you look closely, you'll find the following > > blurb in the paper: > > Even more, there is a another "comparison" from the same guys between NT4 > and Novell. Interestingly enough, NT seem to win against Novell as well > (which make the "test" even more suspect). Yup; I get the distinct impression that Mindcraft are a bunch of shills-for-hire; they'll make your system win if you say so and pay 'em enough. -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on WTnet) | | lcremeans@erols.com | http://wakky.dyndns.org/~lee | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message