From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 16:25:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08D7B983; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AAF42A67; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t60so2331197wes.18 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:25:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3xw6+y39K0WhHkhQGW4AzB0ZQeMV+eAeQ4akcZMEScM=; b=qGjd7JD9wlzWWojn/ZNcJK0S9IsV46o2JS7vlM9vjtg05Ui5QuMriZRbIvUpk5gYhr 5UFgfsqxse8nLEMRapoWFpDUVOS6oi6rys9naxW3F6l/viHeBrSuFHN6pDB7O8075jlV oTJuC5BmvgIWnSgB1YqkP5Lii7bSIMiTRSCjPxi35CeLTglabEy//Xn14mEQIhFzh9gM Z3KqCXtTT3ErSEmovR3RMeNVBs9QpXdE+218OEhxhlMzyiK40nyg9PFPEgw6gpQJEbKv ATXkDb9vNpUDhpnlzjFtZQxt5VtRjD8qQ9CTnyrgop83y3Zv3nz0AR6dFfqNhj2JADbR M5gw== X-Received: by 10.180.198.116 with SMTP id jb20mr11268788wic.59.1403713549519; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm6085525wjf.40.2014.06.25.09.25.48 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:25:45 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: [CFR] Remove texinfo from base Message-ID: <20140625162545.GE23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140625103107.GB23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625104540.GE86779@over-yonder.net> <20140625105209.GC23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625110049.GF86779@over-yonder.net> <40EA1066-4776-4B2E-988A-9900BB842862@bsdimp.com> <20140625154758.GD23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y46ssxGX9/CNNfN6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org, "Matthew D. Fuller" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:25:54 -0000 --Y46ssxGX9/CNNfN6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:09:30AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:20:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > >>=20 > >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 4:00 AM, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > >>=20 > >>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:52:10PM +0200 I heard the voice of > >>> Baptiste Daroussin, and lo! it spake thus: > >>>>=20 > >>>> I have just committed the support for this in ports, anyway breakage > >>>> should be reported, right now it seems fine on my exp-run > >>>=20 > >>> Oh, yes. Sorry, I did phrase that poorly. This shouldn't _break_ > >>> anything, but I suspect it will uncover existing-but-hidden breakage. > >>>=20 > >>> Which is good. But does merit awareness that "hey, this will probably > >>> happen somewhere, so know this is a place to look when a build > >>> breaks". > >>=20 > >> I know it will break certain nanobsd configurations that build ports b= ecause > >> dependencies there (at least for the ones I=E2=80=99ve done) aren=E2= =80=99t well handled. So > >> I agree that this patch is missing, at the very least, an UPDATING ent= ry and > >> a __FreeBSD_version bump. > >=20 > > If you build a port that needs texinfo the port framework will do what = it needs >=20 > Except in environments that don=E2=80=99t do dependencies quite right, or= where only a subset > of ports tree has been imported and texinfo isn=E2=80=99t part of that=E2= =80=A6 But people with them > usually know, which is why UPDATING is needed. That=E2=80=99s all. There= =E2=80=99s nothing else for you > to do. Yes sure UPDATING was anyway intended I'm not sure about the __FreeBSD_vers= ion. regards, Bapt --Y46ssxGX9/CNNfN6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOq+AkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Exx0gCfc9mwkKffv/zbBG+yPP8gy/Sd eG4An14wQFabTUU16j01sjo7u3eWNEV1 =tFgj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y46ssxGX9/CNNfN6--