Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:08:58 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Subject: The preferable version of Moose in the ports [Was: Re: svn commit: r318942 - head/devel/p5-Moose] Message-ID: <20130524100858.GE5283@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <CACi7719%2Bn_mgHr631bx4o2Szx6KfHZ=wDHr4hsH-KPKGEKHVzA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201305240949.r4O9nwfV049698@svn.freebsd.org> <CACi7719%2Bn_mgHr631bx4o2Szx6KfHZ=wDHr4hsH-KPKGEKHVzA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi folks, On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:55:19PM +0800, wen heping wrote: > Is this a trila version ? > > 2.1002-TRIAL Thu, May 23, 2013 > > * re-release with -TRIAL flag, as is proper for 2.10* versions Recently I committed a Moose update to 2.1001 into the ports collection, but as wen notes, it almost immediately got re-released as 2.1002-TRIAL. I am not sure I know what this means - whether the whole 2.10* branch is "trial", or just the first version of it. And I am not sure what to do with my recent commit - whether to keep it in the ports, or revert back to 2.08* branch (bumping the PORTEPOCH in the process). I hope people on this list my have opinions, and I invite you to share them. Thanks, \Anton. -- Our society can survive even a large amount of irrational regulation. -- John McCarthy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130524100858.GE5283>