From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 25 18:15:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704B637B9EC for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:15:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-208-170-118-248.dialup.HiWAAY.net [208.170.118.248]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA24041 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 20:15:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA62877 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 19:53:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <200002260153.TAA62877@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "'FreeBSD Questions mailing list'" From: David Kelly Subject: Re: Cobalt RaQ In-reply-to: Message from "Koster, K.J." of "Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:08:42 +0100." <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522013138B6@l04.research.kpn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 19:53:03 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Koster, K.J." writes: > > > > Aren't they based on a RISC processor? I didn't think they were > > x86-based. That would make it, um, sort of difficult. > > > Well, couldn't NetBSD be a good starting point then? I don't know much about > them, but I like thier logo. :) The early RaQ's were MIPS based. New ones are x86. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message