Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:52:18 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Coleman <chris@bbcc.ctc.edu> To: Mason Loring Bliss <mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, FreeBSD-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetBSD/Linux 'distribution' Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990220164821.17525A-100000@bbcc.ctc.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990220191236.J11361@acheron.middleboro.ma.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sat, Feb 20, 1999 at 11:41:01PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > You *can't* "GPL it". The GPL specifically states "no other restrictions". > > Of course, FWIW, I believe it's entirely possible for the person who creates > something to offer the use of multiple licenses, where the user is allowed > to choose which license s/he uses. Since only one license would be in use > at any one time, there'd never be a conflict. I'd guess at a need for glue > language to keep folks from stripping the unused license, but whatever... > I'd like to see an article on "How BSD protects your intellectual property". Anyone willing to do a short article for The Daemon News on the BSD license? Something that will clue people into the benefits of developing for BSD instead of Linux. Someone who is not afraid to be a little bold? Please send all questions to editors@daemonnews.org and Send any actual articles to article@daemonnews.org -Chris Coleman. Daemon News Editor in Chief To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990220164821.17525A-100000>