From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 20 15:57:01 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FBE106567A
	for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:57:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net)
Received: from mail.xuat.net (maecke.net [85.25.179.71])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53D18FC14
	for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:57:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.10.33] (g230241247.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.230.241.247])
	by mail.xuat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75F77756B;
	Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:24:07 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C1E3A51.8080905@maecke.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:57:05 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?VGphZG8gTcOkY2tl?= <tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de;
	rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Guillaume Seigneuret <gs@omegacube.fr>
References: <AANLkTimMZKyYpG52Xf3pJsiJjYiBuoooOuJQdV8gjrv4@mail.gmail.com>	<010101cb0fb1$e015e370$a041aa50$@fr>	<AANLkTinqzrvXwUkbIXJISn2k-xhTqt3-q7omRXGU95p6@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTKwLrZaclBh70AnRBqwDRAQrUP4JuyYSiIqnF@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C1E2575.2070405@maecke.net> <000301cb1090$df239fe0$9d6adfa0$@fr>
In-Reply-To: <000301cb1090$df239fe0$9d6adfa0$@fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
	<freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
	<mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
	<mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:57:01 -0000

I mean stable in a general way not for FreeBSD (didn't tried out it in
PV yet).

tjado

Am 20.06.2010 17:54, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret:
> I did try with Xen 4.0.0.
> But more stable doesn't meens "suitable for production use" ...
> I think the FreeBSD team has to work on its kernel to make it stable under paravirtualized environment.
> It's not really a question of Xen kernel version.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Guillaume Seigneuret
>
>
>
> Network and System Security Architect
> Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
> Address :
> Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
> Technopôle de Château Gombert
> 13382 Marseille Cedex 13
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Tjado Mäcke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net] 
> Envoyé : dimanche 20 juin 2010 16:28
> À : Guillaume Seigneuret
> Cc : Pandu Poluan; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
>
> Hi,
>
> which version did you use of 4.0? For me, 4.0.1-rc3-pre runs more stable
> than 4.0.0.
> Do you have some more information about the FreeBSD pv? Maybe i will try
> this howto: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10268
>
> tjado
>
> Am 20.06.2010 12:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret:
>   
>> You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone servers
>> for the moment.
>> For information I did try :
>>
>> FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on :
>>
>>    - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
>>    - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel
>>
>> FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on :
>>
>>    -
>>    - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel
>>    - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne
>>
>>
>> Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM
>> partitions.
>> Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210.
>>
>> Cordialement,
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>