Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 13:30:33 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.st> To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager Message-ID: <20050101123033.GA66956@pooh.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <200412281128.46165.reso3w83@verizon.net> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1041228125628.90195C-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200412281128.46165.reso3w83@verizon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote: > Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable > future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly updating > ports. Am I to understand correctly that portmanager _always_ updates ALL the old ports? A 'pormanager -u sylpheed' is not possible then? -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.10 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050101123033.GA66956>