Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:45:51 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Matthew Fleming <mdf356@gmail.com>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org>, Weongyo Jeong <weongyo.jeong@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system Message-ID: <201011051945.51393.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinkeCVJbijsLhutLd9TGge41ZbAbjy-kQ6g%2BSMt@mail.gmail.com> References: <201011012054.59551.hselasky@c2i.net> <201011051935.27579.hselasky@c2i.net> <AANLkTinkeCVJbijsLhutLd9TGge41ZbAbjy-kQ6g%2BSMt@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 05 November 2010 19:39:45 Matthew Fleming wrote: > True, but no taskqueue(9) code can handle that. Only the caller can > prevent a task from becoming enqueued again. The same issue exists > with taskqueue_drain(). I find that strange, because that means if I queue a task again while it is running, then I doesn't get run? Are you really sure? --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011051945.51393.hselasky>