From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 10 18:13:53 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AF516A420;
	Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:13:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AAB43D45;
	Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:13:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1AIDcL5001404
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:13:40 +0200
Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1])
	by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1AICpdN000962;
	Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:12:51 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Received: (from keramida@localhost)
	by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1AICpD0000961;
	Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:12:51 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:12:50 +0200
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To: Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20060210181249.GA949@flame.pc>
References: <200602091800.k19I0gHR024988@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20060210171224.GI21499@submonkey.net>
	<1139592139.790.7.camel@dude.automatvapen.se>
	<200602101235.54875.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se>
X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.35,
	required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.85,
	BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20)
X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr
Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>,
	doc-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>,
	cvs-doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors
	contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:13:54 -0000

On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> You can use common sense though.  He was obviously a ports committer.
> 
> Guys, I'm lost.  What are we arguing about?
> 
> He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since
> the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different
> types of commit bits?
> 
> Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit
> bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access
> files.  :-)

No arguing from me.  I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in
case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we
don't know what this guy was working on''.

It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names
listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about.