Date: 24 Jan 1998 05:19:49 -0800 From: Christoph Toshok <toshok@Hungry.COM> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Free netscape - good or bad ? Message-ID: <m2n2gmvwju.fsf@terror.hungry.com> In-Reply-To: garman@phs.k12.ar.us's message of 23 Jan 1998 18:28:19 -0800 References: <199801231527.HAA10770@hub.freebsd.org> <Mutt.19980123212642.garman@jason.garman.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
garman@phs.k12.ar.us writes: > > Garance A Drosehn writes: > > > > I think it's a good move for Netscape. And to keep this somewhat > > relevent to the hackers mailing list, it will be certainly a good > > move for netscape on FreeBSD... :-) > > > Well, all that remains to be seen, then, is to see whether or not the > Netscape source code compiles with Lesstif :-) <tongue firmly planted in > cheek...> > people have tried this before, with 0.81.. haven't heard of anyone trying 0.82 - it might perform better. 0.81 had undefined symbols. Frankly I would be surprised if lesstif is a viable alternative until some time after we release the code. We stress motif about as far as it can go. The navigator should provide *lots* of information on how particular motif functions work (and what bugs exist in them :) Christoph
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2n2gmvwju.fsf>