From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 15 21:50:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512EE37B698 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:50:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0G5o6D82636; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:50:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:50:06 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101160550.f0G5o6D82636@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Brooks Davis Subject: Re: kern/24368: Not having ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA still has DMA enabled in the kernel Reply-To: Brooks Davis Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/24368; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brooks Davis To: Ken Lui Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/24368: Not having ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA still has DMA enabled in the kernel Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:19:32 -0800 On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:26:17PM -0800, Ken Lui wrote: > I've also been told by Gregory Bond of the same thing. Sorry, but > I'm used to SCSI and ATA/ATAPI kinda sorta looks the same to me. So > what's the proper way to fix my problem? Perhaps a ATA_DISABLE_ATA_DMA > flag? Sounds kinda repetitive. I will probably move the drive to the > primary IDE connector of my A7V. I think you're currently kinda stuck with things as they are, but I really haven't looked into it. I don't have anything better then UDMA33 in ATA land so I've never had any problems with it. I don't think the downgrades are harmful unless you get a panic. Ignoring the messages is probably the easiest thing to do. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message