From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 14:21:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25C116A41F; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:21:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1676743D70; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:20:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAGEKpMm003413; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:20:51 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jAGEKpqe003412; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:20:51 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:20:50 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: joerg@britannica.bec.de Message-ID: <20051116142050.GA3327@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , joerg@britannica.bec.de, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200511161103.jAGB30d4062758@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051116112419.GA1363@nagual.pp.ru> <20051116115900.GA7992@garage.freebsd.pl> <20051116124143.GA2104@nagual.pp.ru> <20051116140635.GB2132@britannica.bec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051116140635.GB2132@britannica.bec.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/pkill pkill.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:21:01 -0000 On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 03:06:35PM +0100, joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote: > The process didn't receive the signal, it died for itself. The new > behaviour is identical to whether it died before the list was build. > Warning about it or stopping with error just makes the two cases > asymmetrical. Ok, I agree. -- http://ache.pp.ru/