Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:23:37 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk>
To:        Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Cc:        Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com>
Subject:   Re: Multiple choices for RAID-0, best performance?
Message-ID:  <40DBE109.6010007@DeepCore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <p0600207bbd0080d2d8df@[10.0.1.3]>
References:  <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT 1PdsKAAAAQAAAArboJgGwHU0apkIeCcojdKwEAAAAA@telia.com> <p0600207bbd0080d2d8df@[10.0.1.3]>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Brad Knowles wrote:

>     My understanding is that regular vinum won't work on 5.x, you need 
> geom-vinum for that.  Recent postings from Søren have lead me to believe 
> that none of the ataraid stuff works with 5.x, either -- you can use 
> them as plain ATA controllers, but the RAID stuff has not yet been 
> worked out.

Wrong, ataraid works fine on 5.x.

However there are some ATA software RAID setups that I havn't done the 
metadata code for yet, but they'll get there eventually time permitting. 
You can always use atacontrol to setup a RAID on *any* ATA 
disk/controller setup, however you will need a BIOS with a known 
metadata layout (Promise/Highpoint) to be able to boot from it (se man 
atacontrol(1) for details)..


-- 
-Søren



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40DBE109.6010007>