From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Feb 23 18:57:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B991500CD3 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 18:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [195.149.99.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "raven.bwct.de", Issuer "raven.bwct.de" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09346A505 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 18:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37]) by raven.bwct.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1NIve3Q031448 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:57:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cicely.de; s=default; t=1550948261; bh=5BhUF69A7gv7qDT7l+me5n53IQHi22pSFWFDh8frqy4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To; b=M6PYU2wldOivmC5iFBDWfq4ciLi/e0YrVC2frJKzR4jrbB7rJxghK/M1AN/1dUcsE CU+L2f4qRFqy3QlYCpy7IpwXp0ZXLHrq27fItR4gNMFwJYrBrjMMxIDOKVWwZTMHEK Kd7Fu11cpoEcIB2cdBrUS5RJ+ExADdzdjRIuO1BQ= Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9]) by mail.cicely.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1NIvZnM022832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:57:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1NIvYuH007196; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:57:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1NIvYVb007195; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:57:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:57:34 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Stefan Parvu Cc: ticso@cicely.de, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RBPI3B+ FreeBSD 12 ZFS Message-ID: <20190223185734.GV93368@cicely7.cicely.de> Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de References: <5D976A97-9800-4A9F-A155-F3BD998AFB4C@kronometrix.org> <19ed5715-f1f1-6c5d-5dc6-e9c5225e5445@denninger.net> <1ED1A0A0-C569-433C-9341-30C40BC4CBF7@kronometrix.org> <20190223141648.GR93368@cicely7.cicely.de> <8BD4B1FF-76C5-423F-9C32-F0D47FD0A604@kronometrix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8BD4B1FF-76C5-423F-9C32-F0D47FD0A604@kronometrix.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C09346A505 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cicely.de header.s=default header.b=M6PYU2wl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.64 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[ticso@cicely.de]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cicely.de:s=default]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cicely.de]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.15)[0.147,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.bwct.de]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cicely.de:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.99.149.195.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.20.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21461, ipnet:195.149.99.0/24, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 18:57:47 -0000 On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 08:14:50PM +0200, Stefan Parvu wrote: > > > > Exactly that's the reason why I'm using ZFS. > > Especially with fragile cards. > > It also is quite a bit faster on cards as it tends to write more linear > > to them and faster writes usually also mean that the cards won't wear > > out as fast as with slow write patterns. > > Right. That was my first initial idea to see how ZFS will work using Transcend, SanDisk > vs UFS. > > How did you get started with ZFS/RBPi ? I suppose you started with vanilla UFs image > and then made that to use a zfs pool ? Is there anywhere documented how one would > start using ZFS on RBPI3 because I think there are no ready images using ZFS. Right ? Yes - I started with a premade image and changed the s2a root partition. No need to care about bootcode as it is already functional, otherwise the same way as you would do for amd64. I've already written more detail in another mail on this thread. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.