Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:57:39 -0700 From: Doug Clements <dclements@linkline.com> To: "Jin Guojun [DSD]" <j_guojun@lbl.gov> Cc: agent dero <dero@bluhayz.org> Subject: Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 4, Issue 7 Message-ID: <20030618185739.GE2215@linkline.com> In-Reply-To: <3EF0B507.2B1B6FDF@lbl.gov> References: <20030614190033.7F0DE37B407@hub.freebsd.org> <20030615091254.M85497@bluhayz.org> <3EF0B507.2B1B6FDF@lbl.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:52:55AM -0700, Jin Guojun [DSD] wrote: > Recently, we tested software RAID via CCD and VINUM, and compared > them to adaptec 2xxx RAID controller. The performance is the same. > The CPU are Xeon 2.8 GHz, SuperMicro MB with ServerWork Chipset. > Seagate 3147xxxxLC drives. > > Problem is the write is slow for all of them, especially when multiple writes. > > Heard from Adaptect that their 5400 RAID has best performance, but > never had one for testing. > > So, soft RAID is ok to save bucks for hardware. How was CPU usage during the tests? --Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030618185739.GE2215>