From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Aug  7  8: 0:16 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1177137B612; Mon,  7 Aug 2000 08:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo [192.67.166.79])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA15833;
	Mon, 7 Aug 2000 07:59:57 -0700
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
Cc: nbm@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Request to refrain from calling 2.2.x unsupported
In-Reply-To: <9959.965646521@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10008070759540.85672-100000@beppo.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


How about "retired"?


On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

> 
> Hi Neil,
> 
> What do you think about saying that "the 2.2.x branch is no longer
> actively maintained", rather than "the 2.2.x branch is no longer
> supoprted"?
> 
> It's not something I feel strongly about, but I do think that the
> proposed text is more reflective of reality.
> 
> Ciao,
> Sheldon.
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message