From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 22:26:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D6B1065693 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:26:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0348FC19 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so47247pxi.13 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:26:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:date:to:cc :subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GO1AouX8HYrYzwrl2sCSbf5Kd46GhrrNae1wmzM6+eI=; b=T5SMz0TRjnIbSeXTf3dxxm35acZWUh9JOG6Y4aWVovEZtAqVRQW20nzPaibq5X41xS 4Cv6NcLlhNT8cGSbw0V+t3L6Tsov0nALXKksHHdViIb+fZVaWuOXBroY2DYK9yojPeNe 2A6LU7Z4ACMMaoZYuIE8iP+39MPwQ7o4JhbcQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=NIkiZdeTp/DNjshUiNuynzd9Y129mLvN7DXLDhU6QZSenIONUITl/Q/rNhCgxTvKc7 w/MfkjHjtIYsqngDu0nrFbEsmicDVc9UQjzKCLBmoBIb01PmQCUQvWvDeFp6OA9yZ4SD JeeFRCuGWHWdOSOOZuMlaTayQdANlghK9wMLA= Received: by 10.114.131.6 with SMTP id e6mr867435wad.20.1285712788456; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([174.35.1.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r37sm13303476wak.23.2010.09.28.15.26.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:25:32 -0700 From: Pyun YongHyeon Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:25:32 -0700 To: a.smith@ukgrid.net Message-ID: <20100928222532.GD1252@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <20100923154054.21153ulpaucsnocg@webmail2.ukgrid.net> <20100924021115.GI15014@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100924123938.80702gxrzyfpury0@webmail2.ukgrid.net> <20100924165452.GA19036@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100927122713.12822br1odth4sro@webmail2.ukgrid.net> <20100927165129.GA1435@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100928132445.72052m5iw9f41ns4@webmail2.ukgrid.net> <20100928214438.GC1252@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100928230824.10533d7gmmba360w@webmail2.ukgrid.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100928230824.10533d7gmmba360w@webmail2.ukgrid.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bge watchdog timeout errors FreeBSD 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:26:29 -0000 On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:08:24PM +0100, a.smith@ukgrid.net wrote: > Quoting Pyun YongHyeon : > > > However don't apply the patch to production box. > > > > Hi, > > actually the only server of this type is a production box, it was > originally running FreeBSD 7.2 without issue but was upgraded when 7.2 > went EOL. > What would you recommend? I guess I can wait for this to be tested by I don't think it would cause severe problem with the patch but it was not heavily tested under various network load so this is the main reason why I took precaution against applying it on production box. If you're prepared to go back to old working kernel and it's tolerable for small down time you may go that route. > someone else as it doesnt seem to be causing and severe issues. The As I said, the patch requires another patch that handles shared interrupt with tagged status. I also have initial patch for that but it needs more polishing and cleanups. Lack of controller that has this issue also makes it hard to write patch. Your controller has no such issue so I wanted to know whether you're seeing known hardware errata or not. > server in question is running wordpress-mu and I havent had any > complaints from end users about this, > > thanks Andy. > > > >