From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 7 14:35:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B82106566B for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 224758FC12 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7187 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 14:35:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ale.andxor.it) (192.168.2.5) by andxor.it with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 14:35:14 -0000 Message-ID: <4C0D03A1.3040100@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:35:13 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090624) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <4C04CAAA.7080001@janh.de> <20100603123728.GA1605@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20100603150208.19603v4b90d4jeec@webmail.leidinger.net> <4C09010A.7010906@janh.de> <20100605233947.00006cce@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20100605233947.00006cce@unknown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Direct or indirect libdependencies (using the libintl.so.8 case) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:35:18 -0000 Alexander Leidinger ha scritto: > The best solution would be to fix the ports to not link explicitely to > indirect deps (by improving libtool and by improving the .pc files > for pkg-config). Then we could even switch from recording indirect > dependencies in /var/db/pkg/-/+{CONTENTS,REQUIRED_BY} to > only record direct deps. How hard is it? What prevents us in doing it? Later we modify libtool upstream, later we could switch to record only direct dependencies. -- Alex Dupre