Date: 10 Jul 2001 23:28:27 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Tim <tim@futuresouth.com> Cc: GH <grasshacker@over-yonder.net>, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, ticso@mail.cicely.de, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nvi maintainer? Message-ID: <xzpn16cxymc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20010709213007.A18204@futuresouth.com> References: <200107072203.PAA09299@windsor.research.att.com> <xzp3d88s3o0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010708005155.J8775@canonware.com> <20010708032002.D97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <20010709150739.A23210@cicely20.cicely.de> <200107091817.LAA16879@windsor.research.att.com> <20010709164715.F85805@over-yonder.net> <20010709213007.A18204@futuresouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tim <tim@futuresouth.com> writes: > I think 99% of the people wouldn't notice if you just put vim in place > of vi. Wrong. The different undo semantics would surprise (and piss off) a lot of people. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpn16cxymc.fsf>