From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 21 19:36:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A6C16A4CE; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:36:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx01.stofanet.dk (mx01.stofanet.dk [212.10.10.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E0043D1D; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:36:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from d40a2021.rev.stofanet.dk ([212.10.32.33] helo=critter.freebsd.dk) by mx01.stofanet.dk (envelope-from ) with esmtp id 1DOhTS-0001gD-0B; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:36:30 +0200 Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3LJaJ2b024076; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:36:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:00:26 +0200." <863btkq7jp.fsf@xps.des.no> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:36:19 +0200 Message-ID: <24075.1114112179@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: Wilko Bulte cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: "David E. O'Brien" cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 boot0.S X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:36:32 -0000 In message <863btkq7jp.fsf@xps.des.no>, =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >Wilko Bulte writes: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:42:28PM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote.. >> > Log: >> > MFC: rev 1.14: remove type 0x4 (FAT12 <32MB) to make room for type 0x7 (NTFS). >> As a matter of curiosity, how does this impact people with minimal FreeBSD >> systems running out of (granted...) very small flashroms for example? > >Last I checked, you can't boot FreeBSD off a FAT partition. There shouldn't be any problems with that apart from what obstacles FAT's limitations impose. Root mounts are not magic any longer so in theory any filesystem should be able to be root filesytem. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.