From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Sep 20 20:24:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A4ABE3BCE for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=00711ef7d9=rblayzor.bulk@inoc.net) Received: from mta2.alb.inoc.net (mta2.alb.inoc.net [IPv6:2607:f058:110:2::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D43DE for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=00711ef7d9=rblayzor.bulk@inoc.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inoc.net; s=201501; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date: In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=P2mA53TmfHchu7nllZH29PISNUbZAh3OledsiPxGfbE=; b=DkLFOai9Owagq5QStEaJ0iGRUv Gpr+YmVKCBlnrZIjrvn1m6Ha3O3HpEMWuXkkJZhrnpKWbcqZzqhUqGeKr3cILZEcqxTePM16qPcDe kEQR91LrydkIjSk3NYw+bCm2unuCfu+9SjxCOGEC2vpOVLrDmLb2schaal4KDUlqeHtFmaakek8Eh QbDXZ5mUI9aqUD9AOsj3rUqW+E+i7wq/zI4E1B+ypHf7rpqyojBQ9Nd1TSR7pIcMlQr+jChbYzGp8 vrRVOrve1sn0GV5IO6QbHLiF8wxk3KJkXy2cMidLoGzIZ9AoEsI4LzveGIEU25onOo/cR5r8luhMr fHE44ckw==; Received: from [2607:f058:11:a:1450:27ad:161c:82ae] by mail.inoc.net with ESMTPA (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRaT-000JNw-W0 by authid ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:24:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: LAGG and Jumbo Frames From: Robert Blayzor In-Reply-To: <48926c6013f938af832c17e4ad10b232@dweimer.net> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:24:13 -0400 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8C764584-DCA9-4407-84E8-AFDC52B35AE1@inoc.net> References: <48926c6013f938af832c17e4ad10b232@dweimer.net> To: dweimer@dweimer.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Auth-Info: cmJsYXl6b3JAaW5vYy5uZXQ= X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.99.2/22226/Tue Sep 20 16:04:49 2016 X-Origin-Country: US X-Anti-Abuse: Please report to abuse@inoc.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:24:19 -0000 If your lag interface is up, what=E2=80=99s not working? Does something like this work? ping -D -s 8972 and then this not? ping -D -s 8972 If your firewall is on the LAN side supporting jumbo frames ok, but not = WAN side, then the router will have to fragment all of the packets. = (unless DF bit is set of course).=20 -- Robert inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP Key: 78BEDCE1 @ pgp.mit.edu > On Sep 19, 2016, at 3:23 PM, Dean E. Weimer = wrote: >=20 > Does anyone see an issue with the Jumbo Frames setup above, or are = Jumbo Frames not supported correctly in a LACP Aggregate configuration.