From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 27 10:48:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from webs1.accretive-networks.net (webs1.accretive-networks.net [207.246.154.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1931F37B41E for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:48:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (davidk@localhost) by webs1.accretive-networks.net (8.11.1/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fARImTw35613; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:48:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:48:29 -0800 (PST) From: David Kirchner X-X-Sender: To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: , Stephen Hovey , Subject: RE: this spam In-Reply-To: <000101c17718$77d43180$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Message-ID: <20011127104635.Y15780-100000@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Yah - I'll bet you will be eating those words when your ISP comes to you and > jacks up your mailbox price an extra $5 a month to pay for all that > "non censorship" your advocating. It's pretty easy to have these high-falutin > ideals when your not paying for them. What about the extra price involved in maintaining the filters, filtering out spam that got past the filters, etc? Storage that does nothing but sit there and occasionally gets backed up (even though it's not common to back up a mail spool, I think, due to its nature) vs. employees maintaining lists, reading spam, inputing additional filters, etc - I think I can see which is cheaper. :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message