Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:45:24 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: csujun@21cn.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MSDOSFS patch of dirty flag (Darwin Import) Message-ID: <3F18CCE4.158B398B@mindspring.com> References: <20030718155108.17132.qmail@web41811.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jun Su wrote: > I began to import some code from Darwin msdosfs. Here > is my first patch about the dirty flag. I patched the > msdosfs kernel module and fsck_msdos to enable the > flag. Can someone test it and checked in? Must I > submit a PR? > > From my own option, the new features of Darwin's > msdosfs are dirty flag, adv_lock and unicode name. I > will check them in the next week. Do these features > have chance to commit? Not if you never get them published. If you want to send attachments to the mailing list and have them get through, you need to send them as text/plain. The best way to see why your patches are not making it to the mailing list is to look at your last patch posting, and see what's difference between your signature and your file attachments, and make your file attachments look like your signature attachment (since it got through). On a side note, you probably do not want to corsspost between the -hackers and -current lists so much. A lot of us are subscribed to both of them, so we get two copies. For some of us, this triggers SPAM filtering, and we never see your posts, unless we save SPAM to a folder instead of deleting it, and go look at it occasionally. -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F18CCE4.158B398B>