From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 6 10:26:58 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id KAA29259 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 10:26:58 -0700 Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA29242 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 10:26:57 -0700 Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14935(4)>; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 10:26:23 PDT Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177475>; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 10:26:18 -0700 X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.1 5/23/95 To: Julian Elischer cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multicast on ep0 device In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Sep 95 19:57:13 PDT." <199509060257.TAA02686@ref.tfs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 10:26:11 PDT From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <95Sep6.102618pdt.177475@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In message <199509060257.TAA02686@ref.tfs.com> you write: >I had the impression that you don't actually need mcast support unless you are >planning on sending it around your local net as a multicast.. At the moment, this is not true; you need one physical multicast-capable interface. Anders Klemets, a summer intern at PARC, has some modifications that will make this no longer true (but need more testing so far =) And, the question was about using the tools on a machine which was on a subnet that already had a multicast router on it, not about using them on a machine which was the multicast router... Bill