Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 May 1999 09:18:02 +0100 (BST)
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
To:        Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth <shocking@prth.pgs.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Hacking objcopy
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905260916190.518-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <199905260307.LAA12331@ariadne.tensor.pgs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:

> 
> Would anyone have any objections to me hacking objcopy so that it could do the 
> following -
> 
> a) Change symbol names from one thing to another
> 
> b) Add/remove dependencies on other shared objects.
> 
> If I submit these changes, what chance do I have of getting them made 
> "official"?

If the changes are modular enough so that it won't make life difficult
merging new versions of binutils, then I don't mind committing such a
thing. If you can get the binutils maintainers to take the change, that
would be the best possible situation.

--
Doug Rabson				Mail:  dfr@nlsystems.com
Nonlinear Systems Ltd.			Phone: +44 181 442 9037





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905260916190.518-100000>