Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:55:31 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Pieter Donche <Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be> Cc: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and portupgrade Message-ID: <20081218175514.B3711@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812181635090.12036@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812181105160.2794@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be><20081218124318.09f16d42@gumby.homeunix.com><Pine.GSO.4.63.0812181358230.7477@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> <20081218151324.698ccb72@gumby.homeunix.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0812181635090.12036@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> README.html). > > So since it's faster and doesn't delete user generated files, upgrade is > always to be preferred over extract, right? unless you made BIG mess in /usr/ports - yes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081218175514.B3711>