Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 20:57:58 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: julian@whistle.com, nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads goals version II Message-ID: <381D8046.812922F6@newsguy.com> References: <199911010341.WAA19654@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Well, that wasn't the intent. My use of lightweight process was to > mean a process. I believe that threads and lightweight processes > mean different things in Solaris. Reword it any way you see fit. Not sure how are things these days there, but maybe they refer to lwp as their previous implementation (userland threads) and threads as their present implementation (kernel threads)? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "People call him Neutron Star, 'cuz he's so dense lights bends around him." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?381D8046.812922F6>