Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 22:55:04 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.Freenix.FR> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: freebsd-install@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Installation" and "upgrade" Message-ID: <199509262155.WAA25519@keltia.Freenix.FR> In-Reply-To: <199509261745.KAA07895@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Sep 26, 95 10:45:35 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that Terry Lambert said: > having inodes at all. There are semantic differences for links in > directories with the sticky bit/SUID/SGID bits set that result from > this. Specifically, you can create links for which you do not have > priveledges to delete. I really think we should go back to the previous behaviour... I don't see what CSRG gained by this. Can someone enlighten me ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #2: Mon Sep 25 02:02:31 MET 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509262155.WAA25519>