From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 10 05:56:10 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C12106566B;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:56:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie
	[IPv6:2001:770:10:300::86e2:510b])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F23BF8FC12;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:56:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie ([134.226.81.10] helo=walton.maths.tcd.ie)
	by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id <aa28646@salmon>;
	10 Jul 2009 06:56:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost  ([127.0.0.1] helo=maths.tcd.ie)
	by walton.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id <aa52257@walton>;
	10 Jul 2009 06:56:07 +0100 (BST)
To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:03:23 PDT."
	<20090709110323.6106a0f3@Awfulhak.org> 
X-Request-Do: 
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:56:07 +0100
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <200907100656.aa52257@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
Cc: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NTP - default /etc/ntp.conf 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:56:11 -0000

> I'd tend to suggest stratum 13 so that the inattentive admin
> doesn't spread his potentially dodgy clock info too far when
> he tries uncommenting the above....  otherwise I (rather
> subjectively) agree with this change :)

I'll change the commented version, as it shouldn't do any harm.
As I said, I usually use 14, which is probably almost too low.

	David.