Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:56:49 -0600
From:      Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
To:        =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su>
Cc:        joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org, muir@idiom.com
Subject:   Re: bin/1019
Message-ID:  <199604182156.PAA01493@rocky.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: <199604182136.BAA00940@astral.msk.su>
References:  <199604182116.XAA02674@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199604182136.BAA00940@astral.msk.su>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > dialer?), but the reason that some PPP packages don't understand a
> > regular Unix login sequence but wanna use PAP or CHAP instead doesn't
> > sound totally unreasonable.  At least, everything is hidden inside a
> 
> If you use PAP/CHAP only, don't even start getty over this line,
> just start pppd on it directly.

What happens if that modem isn't a dedicated modem, and can be used by
non-PPP users?


Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604182156.PAA01493>