Date: 25 Oct 1998 16:21:08 +0100 From: Love <lha@e.kth.se> To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, kom-arla@stacken.kth.se Subject: Re: deadfs in FreeBSD 3.0/current ? Message-ID: <am3e8c6523.fsf@zinfandel.e.kth.se> In-Reply-To: Michael Hancock's message of Sun, 25 Oct 1998 23:57:09 %2B0900 (JST) References: <Pine.BSF.3.95LJ1.1b3.981025232452.1677A-100000@sv01.cet.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> writes: > > Should we bake our own dead_vnodeops_p that is really dead vnodes ? > > I don't know. I think we dont talk about the same thing. All I want is a vnodeops that dead, they shouldn't do anything. We thought that dead_vnodeops_p was written just for this, guess we was wrong. We dont want to do any special vnode management. I consider it a bug if on of the vnodeops make the vfs sleep forever. > Anyway, that's one idea. Maybe the Coda magic isn't so bad. I don't think to. Guess that we will build our own deadvnodeops. Love To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?am3e8c6523.fsf>