From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 9 12:52:50 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA20273 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 12:52:50 -0700 Received: from alf.zfn.uni-bremen.de (alf20.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.20.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA20268 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 12:52:36 -0700 Received: from deceased.hb.north.de by alf.zfn.uni-bremen.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.940318) id AA54682; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 20:52:22 +0200 Received: from jelal.hb.north.de by deceased.hb.north.de with uucp (Smail3.1.29.1) id m0t2OFa-000ZKfC; Mon, 9 Oct 95 20:52 MET Received: by jelal.hb.north.de (SMail-ST 0.95gcc/2.5+) id AA00835; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 18:47:06 +0100 (CET) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA01818; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 18:07:19 +0100 From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <199510091707.SAA01818@saturn> Subject: Re: vm_page_unhold: hold count < 0!!! (was: 2.1.0-950928-SNAP kernel experiences) To: se@zpr.uni-koeln.de (Stefan Esser) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 18:07:18 +0100 (MET) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199510071604.AA10711@Sysiphos> from "Stefan Esser" at Oct 7, 95 05:04:41 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1031 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Stefan Esser writes: > On Oct 6, 23:23, Juergen Lock wrote: > } And (i guess nothing to do with this) once in a while i see > } messages like `in getcc reselect by t1', apparently form the > } ncr code. is that just a harmless race or something to worry about? > } Hardware details (boot -v log) follow... > > The "in getcc reselected by" is harmless and just > means that the driver is determined to finish the > INQUIRY command for that device, but there was an > attempt to reselect for progress in some other > command ... Ah so it just means tagged commands are working. > > Thought this message had been made conditional on > some debug option long ago ... maybe thats only in -current? Anyway had i been told one can get this kind of IO performance out of a PC a few years ago, I guess i wouldn't have believed it. :) same goes for X performance btw... I think its time for a big Thank You to everyone involved! Juergen PS: now what was that about *IDE being better than SCSI? maybe thats true for ms-dog. ;)