Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Sep 2004 21:47:25 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.libnames.mk src/lib/bind config.mk src/lib/bind/bind Makefile src/lib/bind/bind9 Makefile src/lib/bind/dns Makefile src/lib/bind/isc Makefile src/lib/bind/isccc Makefi
Message-ID:  <20040924184725.GC63720@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409241811490.93902@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
References:  <200409241342.i8ODg06a030839@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040924164730.GA4259@xor.obsecurity.org> <41545194.1030700@DougBarton.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409241811490.93902@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 06:16:54PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Doug Barton wrote:
>=20
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:42:00PM +0000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>  Log:
> > >>  Don't expose BIND libraries and their headers to the public by defa=
ult,
> > >>  but have a knob (WANT_BIND_LIBS) to build and install them in /usr/=
lib
> > >>  and /usr/include.  Rumors are that this may be useful at a later po=
int,
> > >>  let's see.
> > >
> > >
> > > The naming of this is inconsistent with the ports collection: WANT_*
> > > variables are for internal port use only, and may not be set by the
> > > user.  User control switches are in the WITH_*/WITHOUT_* namespace.
> >
> > Argh, thanks. I had this thought in the back of my mind, but got it
> > backwards. We'll get this fixed.
>=20
> well actually for the base system shouldn't things be named NO_* ?
> So NO_BIND_LIBS in addition to NO_BIND would be better with but with
> a default to false instead of true ?
> It's confusing anyway because it's the other way round things are
> normally used but ENABLE_BIND_LIBS doesn't sound to be an option either.
>=20
These NO's aren't boolean, they are ".if defined" variables.  I can
offer renaming it to INSTALL_BIND_LIBS, this sounds less confusing
than WANT_BIND_LIBS.  Doug, are you happy with INSTALL_BIND_LIBS?


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBVGu9qRfpzJluFF4RArtmAKCKbfClR8GO2pTJIIyhjfM81EQ45QCfYstM
ww1Zdm3Ke5zH2D7Abrdl0A8=
=MxC3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040924184725.GC63720>